Indaba ‘disappointed’ with Benefitfocus over director nomination delay By Reuters

<iframe src=”//rcm-na.amazon-adsystem.com/e/cm?o=1&p=22&l=ur1&category=homegarden&banner=02NMTC702K4D0VHE1SR2&f=ifr&linkID=17e0b4ac3a719000706e772761d8ae0e&t=forexz-20&tracking_id=forexz-20″ width=”250″ height=”250″ scrolling=”no” border=”0″ marginwidth=”0″ style=”border:none;” frameborder=”0″></iframe>

© Reuters.

(Reuters) -Indaba Capital Management said on Thursday Benefitfocus (NASDAQ:) Inc’s unwillingness to compromise and appoint the hedge fund’s director nominee to the software company’s board was disappointing.

The parties have been trading barbs for weeks over the company’s high turnover in its executive suite and who should be sitting on its board.

In its latest proposal, Indaba had suggested Benefitfocus appoint Ronald Mitchell, one of the two candidates nominated by the hedge fund on March 16, to its board, and in exchange offered to withdraw its other nomination and accept settlement terms.

Benefitfocus said on Thursday Indaba had misrepresented the terms of a privately negotiated proposal, in which Mitchell would be appointed to the software firm’s board under terms consistent with market standards and intended to protect the interests of all shareholders.

“Many of these terms were made necessary because of Indaba’s continued refusal to allow us to vet Mr. Mitchell, or even meet or interview him, until an agreement is reached to appoint him to the board,” Benefitfocus said in a statement.

San Francisco-based Indaba had in February called on Benefitfocus, in which it holds a roughly 9.5% stake, to sell its business following years of poor returns, sluggish stock price during booming markets, and warned shareholders would lose confidence if nothing changes.

Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*


2 + 6 =